rankingsss

thoughts on the rankings placement?
thoughts on the points system?
thoughts on only using a user's primary superstar?
thoughts on starting fresh beginning with pay per views?
thoughts?

i'll add a line or two of descriptions next go round or later

points are as follows

0-5 for promos

matches:
1-loss
2-multi-man/dusty
3-draw
4-dusty win
5-Win
6-multiman-win
7-#1 contender
8-beat champ
9-title retain
10-Title win

these are who i have down as people's main wrestlers. let a brother know if you want me to use someone else.

Brock Lesnar
Eva Marie
The Rock
Finn Balor
Sheamus
Seth Rollins
Randy Orton
Marty Scurll
Steve Austin
CM Punk
Kenny Omega
Matt Sydal
Cesaro
Chris Jericho
Suicide
Dolph Ziggler
Hideo Itami
Roman Reigns
Sting
AJ Styles
Alexander Rusev
Christian
Drew McIntyre
Eric Young
John Cena
Kane
Luke Harper
Ryback
Solomon Crowe
Tommaso C.
Triple H
The Undertaker
Tyler Breeze

I wasn't sure how I felt about starting over after ever ppv at first, but it'll give newer members a chance to get on the charts instead of being blown away by the large numbers developed over longer periods of time.

I also think the primary superstar only is a good idea, because it gives different people a better shot at actually being in the top 10.

Owens will be my primary, not Scurll.

Rankings idea sounds sweet though.

I like this idea but who's doing the rankings, only you? Or is this group based from each admin giving their points and then you find out the average. Everything sounds crystal clear other than primary superstars for me at least, since I don't put them in a pecking order of 1-3. Sam saying how it gives others a chance at being highlighted I'd agree with IF they manage to out do me in promos and I come short in a match. Many will vye to get on the rankings if it's as fair as you say it is I'm on board.

KingWolf wrote:

I like this idea but who's doing the rankings, only you? Or is this group based from each admin giving their points and then you find out the average. Everything sounds crystal clear other than primary superstars for me at least, since I don't put them in a pecking order of 1-3. Sam saying how it gives others a chance at being highlighted I'd agree with IF they manage to out do me in promos and I come short in a match. Many will vye to get on the rankings if it's as fair as you say it is I'm on board.

Krzy's done rankings for years, and he's always been realistic and unbiased. That isn't something you have to worry about.

Sam wrote:

KingWolf wrote:

I like this idea but who's doing the rankings, only you? Or is this group based from each admin giving their points and then you find out the average. Everything sounds crystal clear other than primary superstars for me at least, since I don't put them in a pecking order of 1-3. Sam saying how it gives others a chance at being highlighted I'd agree with IF they manage to out do me in promos and I come short in a match. Many will vye to get on the rankings if it's as fair as you say it is I'm on board.

Krzy's done rankings for years, and he's always been realistic and unbiased. That isn't something you have to worry about.

Then I won't swirl into unkempt misery, things are looking up.

I feel like after every PPV doesn't give a ton of time for points to rly accumulate. Maybe after every other PPV? (assuming PPVs are bi-monthly, so every 4 months.)

thoughts on the rankings placement?
placement of what

thoughts on the points system?
yes

thoughts on only using a user's primary superstar?
yes

thoughts on starting fresh beginning with pay per views?
above

thoughts?
angle should be tied to cesaro bc we're one in the same

~ wrote:

I feel like after every PPV doesn't give a ton of time for points to rly accumulate. Maybe after every other PPV? (assuming PPVs are bi-monthly, so every 4 months.)

This is something I really don't agree with. Special Events happen six times a year, so by having the points reset basically every two months gives ample time for points to add up, and not reach a ridiculous level. No one needs to be 100.0 and beyond. Which if it's every four months, would end up happening. Not to mention with the obvious regular switches that are never going to not be a thing, it needs to reset far more often than every other PPV.


I really like the points system though, the numbers seem fair and can't really be argued. Granted someone could think their promo is a 5 instead of a 4.5 or whatever but at the end of the day you've never given me any reason not to believe you were fair. So nobody else should believe that themselves.


I also do think it should only list one character per person, no one needs to have all of their people in the top five, that doesn't really give others a fair chance.


And I like the placement on the side of the site, don't have to deal with weekly threads, and it's clean, as well as something everyone can easily see.

Rankings System is a good way to get people motivated to promo, almost as good as the whole promo off to get the superstar you want when they become available. The placement is great and convenient on the side there. Everything else I am fine with. But who cares cuz Andre is gonna break the ranking board with his left nut.

With the ranking system focusing on a select superstar, it makes us want to put only half the effort into our other wrestlers since they won't be as highlighted.

KingWolf wrote:

With the ranking system focusing on a select superstar, it makes us want to put only half the effort into our other wrestlers since they won't be as highlighted.

Who's this us?

I do think that it'd be a good idea to have superstar and diva rankings seperately though since they are different divisions.

Dash wrote:

KingWolf wrote:

With the ranking system focusing on a select superstar, it makes us want to put only half the effort into our other wrestlers since they won't be as highlighted.

Who's this us?

I do think that it'd be a good idea to have superstar and diva rankings seperately though since they are different divisions.

Yeah that's not what it makes me want to do at all. I want to put in effort because I enjoy it, the rankings are just a nice addition to the site not a reason for me to want to do more or less than I already do. I'd be open to the idea of separating divas/superstars though.

As someone who only has a diva, I like being graded on the same scale as the guys. I guess I wouldn't be against separating them, I'm just not for it either.

Sam wrote:

As someone who only has a diva, I like being graded on the same scale as the guys. I guess I wouldn't be against separating them, I'm just not for it either.

That's about where I stand, personally like them being grouped together but I'm not opposed to it if the majority want that.

do you guys prefer what I did for brock or madison/eva instead or option c?

definitely the brock one.

TheKrzyOne wrote:

do you guys prefer what I did for brock or madison/eva instead or option c?

I don't know what option c was, but I like what you did with the pictures.

option c was secretly to not do anything